Through resolution A/RES/55/47 of 22 January 2001, the United Nations General Assembly designated UNESCO as lead agency for the International Decade for a Culture of Peace and Non-Violence for the Children of the World (2001-2010).

 

 

This is a formal Report of the International Association of Educators  for World Peace on the  Decade for a Culture of Peace

 

Contact Information:    International Association of Educators for World Peace (Canada)

 

Director of Program:      Mitch Gold

 

Message from the President of IAEWP Charles Mercieca:

 

February 15, 2005

 

Dear Mitchell:

 

I went through your attachment carefully and I must say you have produced a very good, well written, convincing document in the good cause of genuine peace. I advise you send this Culture of Peace Questionnaire to all those on your mailing list across every continent. It should serve as a source of inspiration to everyone that comes across it. Congratulations and keep up the good work. You are 100% on the right track.

 

Charles

 

C/o homeplanet alliance

2 Bloor Street West

Suite 100-209

Toronto Ontario

M4W 3E2

 

Tel:  416-924-4449    

mgold@homeplanet.org

 

WEBSITE:   www.homeplanet.org

 

The activities Launched by our organization:

 

Please review our website and our Educational Materials and our Great Mind Program.

 

While we have over 100 offices and many chapters in our organization we have developed many initiatives to achieve a Culture of Peace through Education.   This Report will refer to the work of  the Canadian Chapter and does not represent the whole organization in the observations that are contained herein.  Many of our individual Country organizations have instigated educational programs generally contextualized within the recommended format of the Canadian Branch,  and many Peace Educators themselves have  explored in their own ways a new thinking paradigm necessary for Peace..

 

I refer you to: files and documents referenced in the Addendum to this questionnaire and the references are repeated in the Addendum.

 

Please review the Madrid Signing Documents For a Culture of Peace at:
http://www.homeplanet.org/june2902/MadridDocumentFinal.htm

 

 

This document has been signed by many Peace leaders in the world -
including both Federico Mayor Zaragoza, and Boutros Boutros Ghali.

 

The program needs funding and support to be fully implemented   $15 million

 

Summary of work:
http://www.homeplanet.org/hpa_reviews.asp?SpecificDocumentID=22
 

IPRA Presentation
http://www.homeplanet.org/hpa_conf_papers.asp?SpecificDocumentID=57

TOPS Presentation Havana May 2002
http://www.homeplanet.org/hpa_reviews.asp?SpecificDocumentID=59

The Great Mind Program – a Preamble to all education.
http://www.homeplanet.org/torontomind_files/frame.htm


Draft Document of the Indigenous Elders for the Decade of Indigenous
Peoples 1995 - 2004.
http://www.homeplanet.org/draftcover.html

and our introduction to Council of the Indigenous Elders..
http://www.homeplanet.org/councilgreeting.html

 

Objectives:

 

To increase the awareness level of the need for the individual to take responsibility for a change in his/her life.  To promote the awareness that  “humankind will make peace when peace makes money”.  The necessity of both a global and local mentality need be encouraged – “globality” as coined by Federico Mayor Zaragoza

 

Beneficiaries:

 

            Or program was intended to serve all peacemakers – to assist by recognizing, bringing together and implementing common core curriculum in the traditions of diverse social, and cultural traditions and movements.

 

Location of Activities – over the Internet, speaking engagements, and presentations at Conferences. Writing, UN News articles, etc.

 

Resources - $500 K.  Our program team has invested in it over $500 K of development costs to date and resources are fully spent.  We have not raised our budget requirements of $15 million dollars necessary to develop our programs fully.

 

Results -  we have a credibility gap.   While our programs are seen to be solutions to the mega-crisis – everyone is afraid of jumping in.  The reductionist mindset that pervades society has difficulty grasping holistic thinking models. 

 

How does one analyze this dilemma.


When Federico Mayor Zarogoza endorses your project in front of 250 of the world’s leading Peacemakers at the inaugural event of the Foundation for a Culture of Peace, one expects some financial support to follow.  It has been five years and after numerous approaches – nothing!.

 

When Boutro Boutros Ghali as Secretary General of the Organization de la Francophonie invites you to Paris and promises Institutional support, one assumes finances will follow.  Not.

 

When Dr. Young Seek Choue invites you to Korea to present to important Peace Educators your program – one assumes finances will follow.  Again nothing.

 

The basic results are a failure from the point of view that the implementation strategy has not been funded.   Frankly this is a criticism of the very organizations that have given tacit agreement to the idea of a Culture of Peace.   How can we achieve a program for a Culture of peace without Funding an Implementation Strategy? 

 

We are not a failure in our program –  we are failing in the Implementation Strategy – our program is better developed today, more comprehensive, and with a higher degree of potential success than any other Culture of Peace program we have explored or experienced.  Ours is a preamble to peace.  During our exploring of Peace Opportunities around the world we found one word  PO.  This word itself opens doors to understanding a new paradigm of thinking as enunciated by its initiator Edward De Bono the grandfather of lateral thinking processes.

 

 

 

2   Key Difficulties

 

Mainly around money and funding – one requires funding to develop infrastructure..

SELL THROUGH to  Peace Movement itself and the Sell through to the Corporate Community suffer from the same conditioning.  Fear Ignorance and Greed.  FIG principle at work.

 

How does one sell through a holistic thinking model to those trained in reductionist thinking?.  The obvious is not so obvious. Our sell through is complicated by a “fear mongering” on the planet that invades the roots of consciousness of even the most well meaning corporate executive. 

 

Association with the UN itself  has very mixed perceptions and especially so  in Canada.  From a “I do not trust or like the UN and anything associated with it”  “What about all the corruption at the UN?”  “ Why has the UN itself taken so long to adopt the UN Global Compact and a Vendor Policy Code that supports its own well meaning initiative.?  For example, our program could be a standard establishing program eliminating the accusations of Blue washing and greenwashing..  

Another difficulty is getting the information to the people that understand the social economic dilemma that we are talking about.   This may be our own difficulty in utilizing language to convey ideas.   Especially when our paradigm is outside of the readers scope of instructions.   This happens at the corporate level, and likely will continue to happen at UNESCO level as we shall find out by the manner in which our document and work to date gets listened to.

 

 

3. Eight action areas of focus.

 

Horns of a dilemma.  I have always disagreed with the specific words in the 8 areas of action for a Culture of Peace..

 

   I believe in one action area of focus – and all the others will fall in – Peace Language.   Developed with Holistic Education  as the Focus.  If we do this within the context of generally accepted thinking models – such as the Medicine Wheel (Wheel of Life), the Ten Transformers, or the Systemic approach of the great scientists like Heisenberg.  We need to move off the duality approach.   PO and Jump Time are considerations that need awareness in the community.

 

Please read the Great Mind Program based upon the Peacemaker philosophy.

http://www.homeplanet.org/torontomind_files/frame.htm

 

So the pedagogy of holistic education is not confrontational as the dinosaurs in education would have you believe.  Publish or perish is the by word of  the intellectual community.   Fear of not understanding PO or Jump Time scares educators.   Understanding the effect of the breath – scares educators.

 .

How do you fund the Culture of Peace?  - through begging? Or through the TOPS program.

 

For example I have disagreed with the wording in the first notion of promotion by the Culture of Peace.  I expressed this when the COP was in its formative stages. . Fostering a Culture of Peace through Education.   This is true but limit the necessary shift we have to do to achieve a Culture of Peace.  This does not mean that we do not teach people how to shoot guns.  It means we teach a responsible use and understanding of the gun and how much energy it requires to make a gun.  When we account totally for the energy required for guns and bombs – we might stop making them.  We need that energy and resources to meet the Millennium Development Goals..  It is not just education that is necessary, but holistic education.   Some in the education field have interpreted this to mean – Peace Education.  Unfortunately Peace Education is being introduced as a new subject.  Peace Education is not a subject – it is a holistic framework for healthy thinking.  Why I say unfortunate is that it becomes a course that people either take or do not take.  I believe the information to achieve a Culture of Peace ought to be included in a Preamble of All education – our Great Mind Program is part of that program.   The Thanksgiving Address also is an integral part of any program.    Of course others may say that it is delinquent in some way.  Well let us add to where it is delinquent.  I propose that this is a multi level, consolidation of basic common core ideas and common beliefs that are open ended and accepting.

 

 By stating this many of the other seven issues are covered.  Sustaining Economic and Social Development – this fundamental in the frame of holistic thinking modeling.   So do we need to have 8 principles?

 

I think we need only one – if I am wrong – please so demonstrate where the holistic thinking models that we present are delinquent.

 

We include the Medicine  Wheel, the Ten Transformers, the Framework for Global Thinking which are all programs within the Great Mind teaching program. 

 

We have expressed to the Secretary  General  in his Panel Threats Challenge and Change that this kind of thinking be pre-ambled into all programs .  This has not been done yet.  

 

 There is a great fear at the UN for the concept of a Global Brand in the area of Business within the UN structure and outside of its structure.  And I believe the fear is greater within its structure.

 

In my humble opinion,  the Culture of Peace has to be broken down to its most simplified common core concepts that are holistic in nature..  This is how we broach the concept  - not of what to learn, but processes of how to learn..  Teaching how to learn is what we ought to be doing by  encouraging servant leadership, valuing the experience of doing things, creativity, and building together that which we know needs to be built.

 

In the Cree Nation they have a word for this.  “Inpean” “   Are you awake.?

 

This is the message of the Unity Ride of Chief Arvol Looking Horse  - the Elder Statesman who led the team of 40  indigenous Elders at the Hague Appeal for Peace?   Have the educators that came together at the HAP that endorse the Peace Education Initiative endorsed the notion of holistic education?  I think you have to ask these  people these hard questions and quite pointedly as I am not allowed to invoke their name in this context.

 

This may be  how we make peace a culture of peace – if we do not have something nice to say about somebody – then best not said.  Invoking a teachers name without permission is not respectful of your teacher.     But those that are leading the Peace Education Movement for the Culture of Peace are challenged to name drop to establish credibility.  What papers have I published this week?

 

Teaching old thoughts is not a welcomed process.  Teaching new thoughts is less welcome.

 

These great teachers need be supported overtly.  There are those teaching Jump Time concepts at the UNDP but have to go unnamed.  Why is this?   My very core is challenged by not being allowed to say what I know for fear of hurting one of my teachers.

 

Why is this? Is a question that The Culture of non Peace must ask  itself.   This leads me to a lesson of one of my Elders who has asked me to carry the message that it is necessary to “melt the ice in the hearts of men”.

 

This may be considered to be a Major Obstacle.

 

4. Progress in the First Five Years:

 

The First Five Years was used in a very unproductive manner.  More on development of new attentions.  I should not say wasted, because where we are now is clearly much better than where we were at the end of our personal 1000 days exploratory voyage.  Our lessons learned were put into development strategies and built to shine light on some of the distractions from our objective of achieving a Culture of Peace.

 

We attended a number of conferences, presenting papers, developing relationships attempting to raise funds at the same time being distracted by having to survive financially and not having the state of the art resources that this work requires.

The substance of this document identifies Progress.  Not progress in numbers of people – but rather quality of the content.

 

 

5.  Major Obstacles for the Promotion of a Culture of peace.

 

Here again I have difficulty with the language of the questionnaire.  The problem is not with the promotion of, the problem is achieving a Culture of Peace..  You be it to promote it.

 

Is this a teaching? Is it not obvious to everyone.

 

We have to live a Culture of Peace ourselves First.

 

This is very difficult when our own program for a Culture of Peace – which was endorsed at the Inaugural event of the Foundation for a Culture of Peace  by the whole conference and in particular Federico Mayor Zaragoza and by Boutros Boutros Ghali  - I plead  guilty of name dropping!

 

So what is the Obstacle – Funding Peace.  How to do it?  TOPS?   When?  Now!!!

 

6. Measuring Progress.

 

I believe we have moved backwards.  The war mentality of the world as expressed in 1977 by Jonathan Schell in his treatise – Fate of the Earth has not moved  our language towards peace language rather we have moved away from it.  Fear is developed in the consciousness of people on a daily basis.

 

Concepts like PO – which might be considered a measuring tool – as to how far has PO gone in educational literature?  How many teachers understand PO?

Myself I am only learning it, but it makes so much sense for a Culture of Peace – to have an entry word.  We can thank the great lateral thinker Edward de Bono for coming up with it.  And we can thank peacemakers for taking the word to the rest of the world.

 

How can this be when the word is still hidden?   You maybe do not like the word?  Then use another word.  Or letter, or sign – but let it be understood that the word letter, symbol, sound, smell be an entry word for peace.  We almost have it in the two finger peace sign but the sign itself does not promote conversation – rather it is a statement – certainly a peace statement but not encouraging further dialogue.

 

These concepts should be discussed –even argued if you like – silent approval does not stimulate a culture  of peace.  I have challenged al members of our own organization declaring that we have not been good teachers.  How could it be so when the world is in such a state.  The teachers must take responsibility.  If we are to have Peace, we must teach for peace, plan for peace, strategize for Peace, fund for peace.

How is it that I cannot raise $15 million dollars to research a peace construct when the U.S. can appropriate an additional  $82 billion dollars more than its already exorbitant commitment to war.

 

I ask you the reader to ask your supervisor the same question. 

 

 

 

7 Developing partnerships and cooperation

 

Over the Years we have developed many relationships and networks.  Unfortunately the networks are over lapping, duplicating energies for survival, and self importance.  I can point out some specific examples. Another Peace Education organization is in its formative stages.  The International Association of Educators for Peace.  They have virtually no status but are a growing body of educators with an agenda to support a Culture of Peace.  When I suggested that we work together the offer was not taken up.    So rather than build a Culture of Peace Constituency, we have the beginning of confusion between people that see our organization – the IAEWP and the new IAEP.  Whose interest does this serve?  And in trying to learn about the IAEP, I find nothing.  Yet they are developing a presence through the Culture of Peace Initiative and I have to wonder.  Certainly the Culture of Peace reporters have to wonder as well.

 

I also want to talk about the formation of the Culture of Peace (COP), the Hague Appeal for Peace (HAP), the International Peace Bureau (IPB) and the Peace Education Initiative.  As the Culture of peace develops certain guides could be utilized.   For example the Hague Appeal for Peace came up with a list of 50 concepts needing attention.  One such point, and I might ad a highly important point was point 40.  To utilize media to support a Culture of Peace.  We have suggested to the IPB to develop a media data base that all Peacemakers might access.  I believe that having a media data base will assist in bringing the Peace Movement together.  The director of the IPB explained he did not have the resources to build such a database.  This demonstrates a systemic problem within the Peace Movement.  The organization that brought together and hosted the event Hague Appeal for Peace – did not develop the resources to implement in any way shape or form any of the initiatives enunciated at the Hague Appeal for Peace.  I remember the event well and marveled at the multiple voices saying the same thing in 100 different ways.  This is not a bad thing.  But if the HAP was an attempt to organize, it ought to have also been responsible for developing the Funding base for implementing the recommendations. 

 

This is not to say that we are the only organization with the only idea for funding our activities.  Certainly many organizations have developed interesting funding approaches beyond begging that have given their organization resources to move forward.  I do believe our program is a higher ordered process for achieving a Culture of Peace, and the World Futures Study Federation agreed by  giving our TOPS program the distinction of an Award for Creating Futures Conscious Organizations.

 

I could also refer to the Peace Education organ of the Culture of Peace as an organization not fully dealing with holistic thinking modeling.  And if I am wrong in this observation I welcome those in charge to explain how they are utilizing the library of materials that our organization sent them.  Where are they?  How are they accessed?  What is the pedagogy of the Culture of Peace Education organization?  Divide and conquer?  Or working together supporting Educators For World Peace.  If there is support there for our organization – I have not felt it in any way shape or form.   Perhaps this observation  should be under Obstacles!  But I am certain it comes from a Funding problem at the Organizational level.  I.e. those who have the jobs do not want to do anything too provocative.  Maintain the old.  Change yes, but slowly..

 

 

8  Website – has it been helpful

 

at first it felt good to identify a central point – but have found no co-operation through the COP head organization.

 

9.  New Projects to promote a culture of Peace over the next 5 years.

 

We are developing the First Nations Indigenous Trust as the recipient organization of the TOPS program.  As part of this initiative we are developing a Mass Media Campaign on the issues involved to achieve a Culture of Peace.  We see the bringing together of the MDG’s the Earth Charter, the UN Global Compact, the TOPS Program through a common Vendor Policy code as a major step.  This is going to be accomplished through a series of documentaries on the issues utilizing a Host City as our Meeting Place.  Toronto – which happens to mean “Meeting Place” has been selected.

 

The Culture of Peace needs a meeting place and Toronto is being proposed.  We are well situated on the planet – close enough to NYC and far enough away.   We have sacred lands being set aside for us to establish a Meeting Place for the Wise people to come together in a good way to examine the processes of societal progress to achieve a Culture of Peace.  Planning for Peace will be one of the oft heard themes as we build a World Youth Center, A World Healing Center, a United Nations Peace University  and a Center to house the Spiritual Forum of the United Nations.

 

I bring to your attention the Peace Event in June 21-28 in Vancouver.  While at this point I have no formal role, I am applying for the privilege of working with this Event to implement the Culture of Peace Strategy as endorsed by the world leaders.  It is too early to know if I will be acceptable.

 

 

 

10:  Priority domains amongst the 8 domains:

 

Education in holistic values.  PO.  Thanksgiving address as a daily ritual.

 

11.  Approaches over the next five years.

 

Building the First Nations Indigenous Trust through developing documentaries on the relevant issues

 

Beginning a Mass Communications Project and have now incorporated into the Culture of Peace Language support for the Millennium Development Goals , the UN Global Compact, the Earth Charter, the TOPS program, and the Great Mind of the Peacemaker.

 

This knowledge and information built together will be a great step forward to achieve a Culture of Peace.

 

What we need is FUNDING for the Mass Media Campaign and Funding to establish the Infrastructure of the ENDORSED  Strategy to achieve a Culture of Peace.

 

ADDENDUM:

I attach my job application form that I am sending to an Event taking place in Vancouver in 2006.  I send this so that the Culture of Peace Organization might understand that even after spending $500K of our own funds – I am still out begging for a job.    Is this the kind of Peacemaker that the Culture of Peace wants representing it?  A beggar for pay for a job I am already doing?  It is difficult to both do the work and beg – it clouds the mind and compromises values. 

 

The resulting observation ought to be made by the review committee.  How to most effectively utilize my mind?  Should I be  co-ordinating and leading an event in Vancouver – or should I be strategizing the Culture of Peace for the Planet?  This could be your decision – not the City Council in Vancouver. 

 

The answer is conceptually  BOTH.   Get me $15 million and I will integrate my budgets to support the Vancouver Event! And watch what is accomplished.   Come with me to Vancouver!!!