“26k-user-tool” for easy use of ISO 26000,
Proposal for a Research Project

Rev 2011-09-25

 

Scope

1.      Develop a Research Project on Integrating the Ten Transposers and the 26k-issue-tool into one royalty-free “26k-user-tool” which should become the easiest-to-use way to credibly demonstrate the self-responsible use of the recommendations contained in the “ISO 26000 guidance standard on social responsibility”, thus eliminating the need for organisation-external service offers like certification, assessment, or training.

2.      Promotion of the use of ISO 26000 throughout the world.

3.      Contribution to the development of a greater understanding of the notion of giving - not as charity - but as a process for sharing.

 

Justification

1.      A "guidance standard" is a rather new type of ISO deliverable, the characteristics of which are not so well known, yet. Essentially the guidance standard offers recommendations, advice, proposals and orientation which an organisation may follow or may decide not to follow.
The number “26000” and other aspects give rise to a wide range of misunderstandings and misconceptions, and – knowingly or unknowingly – misuse of ISO 26000, often undoubtedly practiced for commercial purposes.
This is detrimental to the voluntary widespread use of the guidance.

2.      Particularly larger businesses may see higher benefits by investing into this research project than to spend a similar amount for organisation-external services like audits, certifications, assessment, consultancy, or training.
Such services have developed around the ISO 9000 standard on quality management and ISO 14001 on environmental management and created an enormous business on the side of service providers. ISO 9000 and ISO 14001 audits and certificates are valid only for a limited time so that the certification providers have created an easy revenue source through "standard-based repetitive audits and certificates" which can be considered somehow unsocial especially when looking at small and medium enterprises that are more or less forced by the larger businesses to present such re-certification results.

3.      ISO 26000 on social responsibility should not become a standard that creates a similar business because, again, this would be detrimental to the voluntary widespread use of the guidance.

 

4.      ISO 26000 creates an opportunity to unify change management, corporate training and development and departmental alignment with community service. Community service is the selection and/or distribution of deliverables made possible by a shift in considerations via ISO 26000 education, instruction and optimization. Dialogue empowers the effective use of applicable standards regardless of certification.

 

Budget

to be allocated:  $1 Million

Project organizer

Homeplanet virtual university

Project steps envisaged

1.      Define scope in more detail

2.      Define ingredients like 26k-issue-tool, Ten Transposers, Grow Young

3.      Identify a process and timeline

4.      evaluation of results

5.      Publishing of results.

Leads to be possibly approached before moving further
(list does not indicate any priority or preference)

1.           ISO 26000 including group

2.           Selected members of the former ISO WG SR working group

3.           Selected companies, primarily multinationals

4.           Selected business associations

5.           Skype – using a University program process monetized

6.           MaRS - they have 800 start up companies - considering application of the ISO 26000 to their processes

7.           Founders Space - A START UP NETWORKING GROUP INCUBATOR

8.           Found Ups - a technology driven open source process - that is a start up itself pretending to be  a FOundUp

9.           Social Innovation Center - Toronto - in discussion

10.       Jesuits - involving the First Nations and the Jesuits as a healing venture

11.       XING - A platform where 10 million business people are involved - we have been offered use of platform

12.       Ryerson Center for Sustainable Development

13.       United Nations Global Compact

14.       United Nations Alliance of Civilizations -  opportunity to explore

15.       Brown Mackie College - in discussion - they provide a monthly degree program frame

16.       OISE - U of T - opening intro to Dean only.

17.       Arizona State University Global Institute of Sustainability

Business model
40%  for operator; 40% for homeplanet; 19% for party putting in the $1M,   and 1% to an agreed upon Charity.

 Homeplanet virtual university will have to roll to verify that the organisation/company is intending to use the ISO 26000 Standard “Guidance on Social Responsibility”.  

Homeplanet virtual university will charge $100 per employee and is willing to take barter/currency of the company being involved with – i.e. we bank their currency and we offer the currency to our market place demonstrating the efficacy of our educational process and the value of education as an energy/monetary consideration.  

Every organisation/company allows a value for corporate training - our program can be easily delivered over the net and our program can be measured.   We will develop test results with those using the Grow Young program and those not.

Since ISO 26000 is intended to be applicable to all organizations regardless of type, size or location, ISO national member bodies are organizations in this sense and will be addressed accordingly.

 

Mitchell Gold                         Guido Guertler

mgold@homeplanet.org               guido.guertler@t-online.de

Homeplanet Virtual University

www.homeplanet.org

 

 

 


Annex: the Ten Transposers

 

1.               Will the idea, good, service, issue serve my highest purpose and is it relevant?

2.               Do I have enough information to make a decision? And how do we involve other stakeholders? 

3.               Am I being Wise? 

4.               What Judgments or Bias's exist?

5.               Have I used compassion and mercy in my decision?

6.               Is my heart making the decision on its own? Or is it something that can be leveraged within the environment of our corporation?

7.               Does this allow myself and others to be involved to reach peak performance levels?

8.               Will something of lasting endurance be created? And is it within the current legal framework? 

9.               What is the ultimate impact and will this build a strong foundation? 

10.           Does the idea, good service, issue help heal the planet.?  

 

Should we include website here where more details on the Ten Transposers are shown?

 

 

     

   

Annex: the “26k-issue-tool”

 

This tool is an inherent part of the “ISO 26000 user guide”, which is available at http://www.26k-estimation.com/html/the_26k-issue-tool.html#26k-issue-tool  and at http://www.ifan.org/ifanportal/livelink/fetch/2000/2035/36282/394607/social_responsibility/index-sr.html , as being supported by IFAN, the International Federation of Users of Standards. It enables an organisation in a quick and easy-to-handle manner to identify the relevant core subjects and issues and where action could be taken towards development of society.

 

ISO 26000 describes in its main clause 6 on "Guidance" seven core subjects (organizational governance, human rights, labour practices, the environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement and development), and for each core subject a number of so-called issues where the more detailed recommendations can be found.

 

The 26k-issue-tool is an Excel sheet that shows in the very left column the core subjects and issues and offers per issue six crucial questions in the other columns:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If all six questions in a row can be answered positively, an issue has been identified where an organisation can really undertake action to contribute to the development of society. 
The questions should be answered from left to right, that means from question 1 to question 6, and as soon as one of the questions did not find a positive answer, the related issue can be considered as not well suited for action.